“It is not the strongest of the species that survives, nor the most intelligent. It is the one that is most adaptable to change.”
– Charles Darwin
Across healthcare today, clinicians have been handed a priority list so long as to border on the implausible. Clinically, patient partnerships1 are needed to improve outcomes. Economically, better care must be delivered without waste2. Societally, health equity3 is a continuous focus. Technologically, advancements4 must be evaluated and, as appropriate, incorporated. And all of this is required whilst the structures in which we work are rapidly transforming5, for better or worse. Given the task at hand, even the most optimistic clinician may have moments where the deluge seems unmanageable.
However, during my time at the recent Annual Scientific Meeting of the Society for Cardiovascular Computed Tomography (SCCT), it was clear that clinicians are meeting these expanding demands with adaptation and focus which simultaneously recognize the need to serve each individual patient as well as the field of cardiovascular medicine itself.
Backed by ample clinical evidence6-8 and the 2021 AHA/ACC Chest Pain Guideline9, the use of coronary CTA (CCTA) continues to grow both in terms of clinical volumes and impact on patients10. Such growth presents challenges and opportunities, as changes are afoot for clinical services, patient population expansion, workflows, reimbursement, and imaging technology advancements. All of these were active themes in the more than 200 new science presentations throughout the SCCT meeting.
A host of highly enabling scientific data presentations and discussions focused on (1) technological integration of artificial intelligence (AI)-enabled CCTA tools into daily clinical care and (2) assessment and quantification of coronary plaque burden via CCTA. These headlining topics at SCCT are representative of some of the most exciting opportunities and challenges11 in the field of medicine today.
In the years leading up to and during the meeting itself, it was a great privilege for me to be involved in several scientific studies presented at the meeting, assessing the clinical performance and utility of the HeartFlow RoadMapTM Analysis (an AI-enabled anatomic visualization to aid clinicians in the interpretation of CCTA images), and the HeartFlow Plaque Analysis, (an AI-enabled quantitative coronary plaque analysis technology):
The RoadMap Analysis
The Plaque Analysis
These studies will help clinicians to apply an evidence-first approach to the critical decisions regarding the integration of validated tools that would have sounded outlandish just a few years ago. By understanding both the diagnostic performance and the clinical utility of the technologies before us, we can better ascertain how they will impact our patients and our practices.
In order to move beyond the seemingly Sisyphean expectation laid before all clinicians to do more with less, we must adapt the technologies we employ to support our work. The technologies discussed at SCCT will require changes to our practice patterns, but the evidence is becoming increasingly clear that our adaptation to embrace better tools responsibly will set the stage for highly meaningful clinical breakthroughs.
—
REFERENCES
1 Paterick, et al. Improving health outcomes through patient education and partnerships with patients. Proc BUMC 2017. DOI:10.1080/08998280.2017.11929552
2 Shrank, et al. Waste in the US Health Care System: Estimated Costs and Potential for Savings. JAMA 2019. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2019.13978
3 Baciu, et al. Communities in Action: Pathways to Health Equity. National Academies Press 2017. ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK425844/
4 NIH Technology Breakthroughs
5 Gale, AH. Bigger But Not Better: Hospital Mergers Increase Costs and Do Not Improve Quality. Mo Med 2015. PMID: 25812261
6 Newby, et al. 5-Year Results of the SCOT-HEART trial. N Engl J Med 2018. DOI:10.1056/NEJMoa1805971
7 Maurovich-Horvat, et al. Primary Results of the DISCHARGE trial. N Engl J Med 2021. DOI:10.1056/NEJMoa2200963
8 Douglas, et al. Primary Results of the PLATFORM trial. Euro Heart J 2015. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehv444
9 Gulati, et al. AHA/ACC Guideline for the Evaluation and Diagnosis of Chest Pain. JACC 2021. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2021.07.053
10 Weir-McCall, et al. National Trends in CAD Imaging: Associations with Health Care Outcomes and Costs. JACC Img 2022. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2022.10.022
11 Dave, et al. Chat GPT in Medicine: An overview of its applications, advantages, limitations, futures prospects, and ethical considerations. Front Artif Intell 2023. DOI: 10.3389/frai.2023.1169595
HeartFlow Analysis is consisted of four main functions; FFRCT, Planner, Roadmap, and Plaque. All four functions are cleared for clinical use in the United States, Bahrain, Israel, and United Arab Emirates. Only FFRCT and Planner functions are cleared cleared for clinical use in Europe, United Kingdom, Australia, Canada, and Japan. Please see HeartFlow Analysis Indications for Use and Instructions for Use for more information.
© 2024 HeartFlow, Inc. | HeartFlow and the HeartFlow logo are registered trademarks of HeartFlow, Inc. Additionally, RoadMap is claimed as a trademark of HeartFlow, Inc. www.heartflow.com | 331 E Evelyn Ave, Mountain View, CA 94041
*Required fields
If you would like to request to have the HeartFlow Analysis available at a location near you, please submit your information below with details of the institution. We will share this information with the institution, but it will not guarantee HeartFlow will become available.
*Required fields
オンライン提出フォームから研究助成金を申請してください。
HeartFlow FFRCT 分析は、有資格の臨床医による臨床的に安定した症状のある冠状動脈疾患患者への使用を目的とした個別化された心臓検査です。 HeartFlow Analysis によって提供される情報は、資格のある臨床医が患者の病歴、症状、その他の診断検査、および臨床医の専門的判断と組み合わせて使用することを目的としています。
ハートフロー分析に関する追加の適応情報については、次のサイトをご覧ください。www.heartflow.com/indications.
さらに質問がある場合は、このメッセージを閉じてフォームに記入するか、サポート チームにお電話ください。: 877.478.3569.
The HeartFlow FFRCT Analysis is a personalized cardiac test indicated for use in clinically stable symptomatic patients with coronary artery disease by qualified clinicians. The information provided by the HeartFlow Analysis is intended to be used by qualified clinicians in conjunction with the patient’s history, symptoms, and other diagnostic tests, as well as the clinician’s professional judgement.
For additional indication information about the HeartFlow Analysis, please visit www.heartflow.com/indications.
If you have additional questions, close out of this message to complete our form or call our support team: 877.478.3569.Please use our online submission form on the Clinical Research Page to apply for research grants.
Thank you for your interest!
Executive Vice President and Chief Medical Officer
Campbell brings a wealth of experience to HeartFlow, where he serves as the Chief Medical Officer. Prior to joining HeartFlow, he was the Chief Scientific Officer and Global Head of Research and Development at Cordis Corporation, Johnson & Johnson, where he was responsible for leading investments and research in cardiovascular devices. Prior to Cordis, he was Associate Professor of Medicine at Harvard Medical School and the Harvard-M.I.T. Division of Health Sciences and Technology, and Director of the Cardiac Catheterization and Experimental Cardiovascular Interventional Laboratories at Brigham and Women’s Hospital. He served as Principal Investigator for numerous interventional cardiology device, diagnostic, and pharmacology trials, is the author of numerous journal articles, chapters, and books in the area of coronary artery and other cardiovascular diseases, and was the recipient of research grant awards from the NIH and AHA.
He received his A.B. from Harvard College and his M.D. from Harvard Medical School.